Set the destination
Explain the problem, constraints, success criteria, and what may be changed.
FIELD GUIDE / EDITION 01
A visual user guide to ForgeFlow, from installation to a reviewed, validated handoff.
ForgeFlow gives your coding assistant a repeatable way to understand a task, involve specialists, build carefully, and check the result. Ember shows the workflow’s reported activity.
A developer or project owner using Claude Code or Codex, comfortable opening a terminal and a Git repository. You do not need to know ForgeFlow’s agents or commands.
A working installation, one small reviewed change, an understandable dashboard, and a repeatable path to shipping the next change.
Workflow reference verified against ForgeFlow commit 1353184 · 6 September 2026
Visual identity and workshop screenshot refreshed 22 September 2026. The workshop screenshot uses illustrative example data. Ember gallery images use its labeled preview controls. Example project prompts describe a teaching scenario, not a completed project.
YOUR READING PATH
Start at installation, or jump to the chapter you need.
Numbers identify chapters. In a PDF reader, use these links to jump to a chapter. Each chapter begins on a new page.
02 / THE MAP
You explain the outcome. ForgeFlow organizes the work around it.
Explain the problem, constraints, success criteria, and what may be changed.
Prepare context, choose useful specialists, preserve decisions, and run checks.
Inspect the result and validation. Give explicit instructions for remote actions such as pushing or publishing.
| Agent | What they contribute |
|---|---|
| Builder | Backend structure, data, naming, and code quality. |
| Guardian | Security, validation, system boundaries, and reuse. |
| Designer | User experience, accessibility, frontend quality, and connectivity. |
| Coordinator | Scope, coordination, project memory, and handoff notes. |
| Architect | Combines specialist input into a brief or technical verdict. |
| Product Lead | Checks requirements, tests, plan adherence, and product intent. |
| Verifier | Checks high-risk findings using visible evidence. |
Small, clear changeQuick → validate
Feature with a known goalConsult → implement → review → ship
Uncertain product or architectureDiscuss → research → plan → consult → implement → review → ship
Not every task needs every agent or every phase. A route can be skip, thin, full, or deep, depending on the change. Ask for the reason when the route is unclear.
Brief: the implementation contract. Artifact: a saved local result, such as that brief. Host: Claude Code or Codex, where you talk to the assistant.
03 / INSTALL
Use the same computer and shell environment in which your coding assistant runs.
The repository’s CI validates on Node.js 24. These terminal examples use Bash; Windows users need a compatible Bash environment, such as WSL, with the host and files in that same environment. ForgeFlow uses your host’s available model access and permissions.
git --version
node --version
npm --version
git clone https://github.com/BrandedTamarasu-glitch/ForgeFlow.git
cd ForgeFlow
Choose one host below. Preview the destinations, then install. This runs from the ForgeFlow checkout, not from your application repository.
node scripts/forgeflow/install-template.js --target codex --dry-run --json
node scripts/forgeflow/install-template.js --target codex
FF_RUNTIME="${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/forgeflow"
node scripts/forgeflow/install-template.js --target claude --dry-run --json
node scripts/forgeflow/install-template.js --target claude
FF_RUNTIME="$HOME/.claude/forgeflow"
To install both, use --target both. The template installer copies managed files and preserves unrelated configuration; it does not merge your host settings.
npm install --prefix "$FF_RUNTIME/services/dashboard" --ignore-scripts
npm install --prefix "$FF_RUNTIME/services/agent-chat" --ignore-scripts
04 / CONNECT
Files on disk and a host that has loaded them are two different checks.
After restarting, invoke $quick or $consult. For ForgeFlow review, use $forge-review. Codex’s /review is its built-in review, not this workflow.
Agents are copied into ~/.codex/agents/; skills into ~/.codex/skills/. A custom CODEX_HOME changes those roots. Do not replace your existing config with the repository sample.
After restarting, commands such as /quick and /consult should be available. The template installer leaves ~/.claude/settings.json for you to merge manually.
Hooks provide phase entry, telemetry, and context guidance. Preserve existing settings and avoid registering a hook twice if another installation already provides it.
| Host setting | Installed script under ~/.claude/hooks/ |
|---|---|
| SessionStart and UserPromptSubmit | forgeflow-lean-activate.js |
| PostToolUse | forgeflow-context-monitor.js, forgeflow-gate.js, and forgeflow-telemetry.js |
| statusLine | forgeflow-statusline.js |
Use the repository’s manual settings guidance as the source for the merge. A command should use an expanded home path, such as node "$HOME/.claude/hooks/forgeflow-telemetry.js". Ask the assistant to inspect the existing settings and present the exact additions before applying them.
Inspect my existing Claude Code settings and ForgeFlow’s post-install hook guidance. Show the additions needed for hooks and the status line, preserving unrelated settings and avoiding duplicate registrations.
Validate the resulting JSON, restart Claude Code, and run /forgeflow-health. See Settings and Recovery for the detailed wiring and recovery reference.
05 / YOUR PROJECT
ForgeFlow is installed once per host. Its working notes belong to each project.
Open the repository you actually want to improve. Replace the example path below, confirm the Git state, and choose a new branch name.
cd /path/to/your-project
git status --short
git switch -c feature/forgeflow-first-task
bash "$FF_RUNTIME/scripts/forgeflow/ensure-forgeflow-state.sh"
node "$FF_RUNTIME/scripts/forgeflow/seed-budget-config.js" --json
The first helper creates local workflow folders and ignores .forgeflow/. The budget helper seeds a config without overwriting an existing one. Inspect any repository changes before committing.
$quick inspect this repository. Identify how to run it, its relevant tests, and a small first task. Read only; do not edit files.
/quick inspect this repository. Identify how to run it, its relevant tests, and a small first task. Read only; do not edit files.
Ask for the first-run guide, a project code map, or a project operating model if the repository is unfamiliar. Missing optional reports are normal before you generate them. The general health helper includes Claude installation assumptions; use Codex file discovery and its actual skills to verify a Codex installation rather than treating every Claude inventory item as required.
06 / FIRST USEFUL RUN
Worked example: an existing task-list app should explain its empty state.
When the task list is empty, show helpful text and a button that opens the app’s existing task form. Keep the existing design and task-creation behavior.
$consult produce an implementation brief for an empty task-list state. Show “No tasks yet” and a Create task button using the existing form. Cover keyboard access, loading, and errors. Keep the change local.
/consult produce an implementation brief for an empty task-list state. Show “No tasks yet” and a Create task button using the existing form. Cover keyboard access, loading, and errors. Keep the change local.
Confirm where the change belongs, what is out of scope, and which checks will prove it works. Correct misunderstandings now.
Run the implementation command below. The assistant should name the files changed and explain validation.
Open the app, visit an empty list, and activate Create task with both mouse and keyboard. Check loading and error states too.
Run the review command. Ask for concrete findings tied to this change. Resolve required corrections and rerun affected checks.
Run Ship to prepare a summary. Inspect the diff and test results before requesting a commit, push, or deployment.
$implement execute the current brief
$forge-review review the current changes against the brief
$ship prepare the branch and summarize validation
/implement execute the current brief
/review review the current changes against the brief
/ship prepare the branch and summarize validation
07 / DISCUSS & RESEARCH
Use these phases when the destination or the approach is not yet clear.
State the user problem, who is affected, constraints, accessibility needs, and success criteria. The useful output is a shared problem statement and a list of open questions.
Compare the codebase’s existing patterns, plausible alternatives, integration risks, and tradeoffs. The useful output is evidence and a reasoned choice, including what remains uncertain.
$discuss users cannot tell whether an empty task list means no tasks, loading, or an error. Frame the behavior and acceptance criteria.
$research compare ways to reuse the current task form from the empty state. Inspect existing patterns first.
/discuss users cannot tell whether an empty task list means no tasks, loading, or an error. Frame the behavior and acceptance criteria.
/research compare ways to reuse the current task form from the empty state. Inspect existing patterns first.
A user can understand the current state and create a task without learning a new interaction.
Use the current form, preserve permissions, and keep loading and error behavior distinct.
Does the existing form work from this route? Which focus behavior should be reused?
Focused research automatically chooses normal or divergent research and explains the route. Use --no-diverge for a focused investigation, or --diverge when you deliberately want independent approaches to a consequential decision.
$research --no-diverge investigate why the current task form loses keyboard focus
/research --no-diverge investigate why the current task form loses keyboard focus
08 / PLAN & CONSULT
A plan sequences the work. A consultation defines how the implementation should fit together.
$plan create a phased plan for the empty-state change, including keyboard validation and scope boundaries.
$consult turn the plan into a concrete implementation brief using existing components.
/plan create a phased plan for the empty-state change, including keyboard validation and scope boundaries.
/consult turn the plan into a concrete implementation brief using existing components.
| Look for in the brief | Example for the task-list change |
|---|---|
| User-visible behavior | Empty list has explanatory text and a working action. Loading and failure have their own states. |
| Scope boundaries | Reuse the form; do not redesign the whole task page. |
| Interfaces and ownership | Identify the list component, form entry point, and who owns each change. |
| Accessibility | Keyboard activation, visible focus, and predictable focus after opening or closing the form. |
| Validation | Check empty, populated, loading, and error views; confirm the existing creation path still works. |
| Known uncertainties | Call out any component or behavior not verified in the codebase. |
The usual local files are .forgeflow/<project>/current-plan.md and current-brief.md. The implementation workflow expects the current brief, so check that it describes this task rather than a previous one.
09 / IMPLEMENT
The brief is the reference point as work becomes code.
$implement execute the current brief. Preserve unrelated edits, run relevant checks, and report any scope change before broadening the work.
/implement execute the current brief. Preserve unrelated edits, run relevant checks, and report any scope change before broadening the work.
The assistant reads the current brief, identifies relevant files, and uses compact context and ownership notes when available.
Specialists work where useful. A shared interface or overlapping file ownership should be resolved before parallel edits cause conflicts.
Product Lead focuses on the required checks; integration review checks that the pieces fit. The exact commands depend on your application.
Implementation notes preserve choices, tradeoffs, deviations, follow-ups, and validation evidence for the next phase.
Keep the change limited to the task-list view and its tests.
Explain the test failure before changing the implementation.
Show what changed from the brief and why.
Pause before any database migration or deployment.
It should explain what changed, why, how it was checked, and what is still unverified. A passing test count alone does not tell you whether the requested behavior was covered.
For visible changes, use the application. Look at mobile sizing, keyboard navigation, empty/loading/error states, and the original flow that should still work.
10 / REVIEW
Review compares the change with its requirements and the evidence in the code.
$forge-review review this branch against main and the current brief. Prioritize concrete correctness, security, and accessibility findings.
/review review this branch against main and the current brief. Prioritize concrete correctness, security, and accessibility findings.
| Architect decision | What to do next |
|---|---|
| APPROVE | No blocking change is requested by this review. Still inspect validation and any remaining shipping requirements. |
| CONDITIONAL APPROVE | Read and satisfy the stated conditions. Do not assume they are optional. |
| REVISE | Correct the identified issues, run affected checks, and request follow-up review. |
| BLOCK | Resolve the blocking risk or missing evidence before proceeding. |
Product Lead can CONFIRM or CHALLENGE the verdict. Verifier can confirm, reject, or block a high-risk finding from visible evidence. These are different roles, not interchangeable approval labels.
A location, a concrete trigger, an explanation of the effect, and enough evidence to judge the proposed correction. Ask for clarification if a finding is only a preference or a vague prediction.
Fix the confirmed findings from this review. Keep the patch scoped, rerun the affected checks, and request a follow-up review.
For a deeper examination of a subsystem, use /audit or $audit. For conservative automated repair in Claude Code, /review-auto has additional rules and limits. There is no matching installed Codex $review-auto skill in this edition.
11 / THE WORKSHOP
Open http://127.0.0.1:4003/ on the machine running ForgeFlow.
Task evidence. The active task, acceptance criteria, saved evidence, and next action for the launched project.
Ember. The current room’s reported work, preview studio, and motion controls.
Project health. Readiness for the repository that launched this dashboard. Copy its next action into your assistant.
Review outcomes. All-time totals for the selected summary project, with conditional approvals shown separately.
Review trends. All projects, using the latest 4, 12, or all recorded ISO weeks.
Live activity. Workflow phase updates and agent messages, with filters and recent history.
Saved evidence. Expand for individual readiness reports and the Lean Prime checklist.
12 / MEET EMBER
Ember reflects explicit reports. Time passing does not imply success.
Gallery captured using Animation studio previews. The live text label is the authoritative description, including for screen readers.
| Other state | How to read it |
|---|---|
| Researching | The workflow is investigating and gathering evidence. |
| Waiting | Work needs input, or an active report is over 90 seconds old. Read the label to distinguish the two. |
| Failed | A task or check explicitly reported failure. Inspect the actual result. |
| Offline | The activity connection is unavailable. It does not tell you whether the underlying task succeeded. |
Open Animation studio. A preview is visibly labeled and only changes the local pose. Return to live to follow reported work.
Use Pause motion or your system’s reduced-motion preference. Pausing the animation does not pause activity updates or the workflow.
When several agents report, fresh failures and waiting states take priority over active work; active work takes priority over completion. Ember may therefore show an issue even while another agent has finished.
13 / READ THE SIGNALS
Know which source each panel reads before trying to fix it.
| Panel | Source and scope | When it is empty |
|---|---|---|
| Project health | Saved artifacts for the launched repository. It is not an overall diagnosis of every installed tool. | Some reports have not been generated yet. Expand the details. |
| Review outcomes | Saved verdict telemetry from local Claude and Codex project roots. Summary filter selects all-time totals. | No verdicts were recorded in the selected scope. Planning, tests, and activity do not create approvals. |
| Review trends | Weekly saved verdict buckets across all projects. The window means recorded weeks, not every calendar week. | There may be no saved verdicts, or no data in the selected recorded window. |
| Live activity | The activity service’s current room, independent of the summary project filter. | No current messages or states have been reported, or the selected filter hides them. |
A budget violation, missing project guidance, actual saved blocker, or corrupt evidence needs investigation. Use the summary and suggested command.
Unrecorded benchmarks, cross-host verification, release snapshots, or failure digests may be expected. No failure digest is needed until there is a real failure to capture.
Watch with zero actionable warnings can mean optional evidence is still incomplete. It does not mean those optional activities were performed or passed. Lean injection can remain unavailable when evidence is too thin; the underlying status stays visible.
Refresh data fetches metrics and readiness separately. A failed refresh keeps the previous snapshot and labels it stale. Initial errors say Unavailable. The live WebSocket connects independently. Refresh the browser after installing a new dashboard version.
14 / CONTEXT & MEMORY
Local evidence should help the next task without turning old assumptions into rules.
Most local artifacts live under .forgeflow/<project>/. Treat them as advisory context. Current instructions, code, and test evidence take precedence.
Ask the assistant to identify the oversized packet, narrow the file list, and trim unrelated memory or split the work into review waves. Do not increase a budget just to turn a warning green. The default compact-token limit is 16,000 unless project configuration changes it.
node "$FF_RUNTIME/scripts/forgeflow/check-context-budget.js" --root .forgeflow --warn-only --json
node "$FF_RUNTIME/scripts/forgeflow/advise-context.js" --root .forgeflow --record --json
The advisor can record local trend history. Token figures are estimates; they are not a bill or proof of a model’s actual usage.
Tell ForgeFlow how you want it to work, such as concise updates and explicit validation status. Ask to record only preferences you intentionally choose. Keep project-specific design preferences local to that project.
Before we stop, summarize the current goal, decisions, changed files, checks completed, unresolved issues, and the next concrete step. Save this as local handoff context.
15 / SHIP
Preparing to ship, pushing code, and deploying a product are separate actions.
$ship prepare this branch for handoff. Summarize the behavior change, validation, known limits, and proposed PR description.
/ship prepare this branch for handoff. Summarize the behavior change, validation, known limits, and proposed PR description.
Summary, presentation, and PR body.
Diff, tests, review conditions, remaining risk.
Specify commit, push, PR, or deployment.
Check the remote run and resulting behavior.
Under .forgeflow/<project>/ship/, inspect ship-summary.json, ship-presentation.html, and pr-body.md.
Ask the assistant to refine generated summaries against the final change. A report assembled from old notes can be incomplete; read it before publishing.
Commit these reviewed changes, push this branch, create a draft PR to main, and monitor its CI. Fix failures caused by this change. Do not deploy.
For an already agreed main-branch workflow, state that target explicitly instead. The assistant should respect repository policy and your intended release process.
| Evidence to check | Question to answer |
|---|---|
| Behavior | Does the result satisfy the original acceptance criteria? |
| Review | Were required corrections and approval conditions resolved? |
| Validation | What ran, what passed, and what was not verified? |
| Remote CI | Does the successful run belong to the exact pushed commit? |
| Release | Is tagging or deployment required by this project, and was it actually requested? |
16 / TROUBLESHOOT
Use a specific check before reinstalling, widening scope, or rerunning everything.
| What you see | What to check or do |
|---|---|
| Skill or command missing | Restart the host. Confirm the selected installation home and rerun its dry-run installer. In Codex, use $forge-review. |
| Agent model unavailable | Identify the agent and model. Choose an available model explicitly; rerun the failed role. |
| Dashboard never opens | Check dashboard dependencies and a stable host session ID. CI, SSH, headless Linux, or FORGEFLOW_DASHBOARD_AUTO_OPEN=off skip automatic startup. Try the local URL or manual startup below. |
| Ember Offline | Start agent-chat with $agent-chat-on in Codex or /agent-chat:on in Claude Code. Inspect any startup error. |
| Ember Waiting | Read the label. It can mean input is needed or the last active report is stale. Ask for the actual task status. |
| Live Activity empty | Select All activity. Confirm the connection and current room. The host must report phases or messages; opening the page alone creates neither. |
| Outcomes or trends empty | Complete and record a real review. Then use Refresh data and check the project filter. Do not create fake history to fill the chart. |
| Readiness needs attention | Expand the affected report. Distinguish missing optional evidence from saved failures or unreadable artifacts. Run the stated correction in the assistant, then refresh. |
| Port already occupied | Identify the owning process. Reuse the expected service or deliberately restart it. Do not kill an unknown process merely to free a port. |
From the intended project, keep this terminal process running; then open the URL in a browser on the same machine.
node "$FF_RUNTIME/services/dashboard/server.js"
Codex: in a clean ForgeFlow source checkout, run git pull --ff-only, rerun install-template.js --target codex, and restart Codex. Resolve local source edits before pulling.
Claude Code: use /update-forgeflow; use --repair for missing managed files. The updater’s --rollback restores its previous managed-file snapshot when one exists. Restart and verify. That rollback mechanism is not a general Codex rollback.
17 / DESK REFERENCE
Choose a host command for the workflow; use a terminal helper for a specific local report.
| Goal | Claude Code | Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Small task or orientation | /quick | $quick |
| Frame the problem | /discuss | $discuss |
| Compare approaches | /research | $research |
| Sequence the work | /plan | $plan |
| Write the implementation brief | /consult | $consult |
| Execute the brief | /implement | $implement |
| Review current changes | /review | $forge-review |
| Deep subsystem analysis | /audit | $audit |
| Prepare shipping artifacts | /ship | $ship |
| Start / stop activity service | /agent-chat:on/agent-chat:off | $agent-chat-on$agent-chat-off |
Run from your project with the FF_RUNTIME set during installation. Read each result before deciding on the next action.
node "$FF_RUNTIME/scripts/forgeflow/build-project-operating-model.js" --json
node "$FF_RUNTIME/scripts/forgeflow/show-project-trends.js" --refresh --json
node "$FF_RUNTIME/scripts/forgeflow/render-lean-prime.js" --json
node "$FF_RUNTIME/scripts/forgeflow/render-release-readiness.js" --plan-only --json
The model and trend helpers write or refresh local guidance. Lean Prime here reports readiness; release readiness with --plan-only previews checks rather than running them. None of these examples asks for a commit or deployment.
UI iteration: measured browser and accessibility checks. Fleet: independent work in isolated worktrees. Review-auto: conservative repair with its own evidence rules. Lean and context waves: control context volume. Team adoption: collect real outcomes before making quality or efficiency claims.
Availability differs by host. The Claude command catalog is larger than the installed Codex skill set; do not assume every slash command has a dollar-prefixed equivalent.
18 / YOUR NEXT RUN
A repeatable first run is more useful than memorizing the command catalog.
Guide sources: repository README, template installer and manifest, workflow skills, dashboard server/readiness/Ember implementations, and the linked documentation at commit 1353184. Workflow instructions document that implementation; later versions may differ. The visual identity and workshop screenshot were refreshed on 22 September 2026.
ONE CLEAR OUTCOME. ONE WELL-FORGED CHANGE.